IUCN Red List data observations

An unofficial, independent review to support data improvement · IUCN Red List version 2026-1
This is an unofficial, independent compilation. It is not produced, reviewed, or endorsed by the IUCN or the IUCN Red List. It gathers observations noticed while preparing Red List data for use on Wikipedia and Wikidata, and it is shared in the hope that some are useful for a future release.

This page collects observations about the data in IUCN Red List version 2026-1. The tables below group the observations; each links to a description with a short preview, a full sortable list, and a CSV download. The intent is to help with data review for the next release. Every observation may be incomplete or mistaken.

Release reviewed
IUCN Red List version 2026-1
Generated
2026-09-03
Catalogue of Life reference
COL26.7 XR (2026-07-17), used as a taxonomic comparison in the Catalogue of Life reports

How this was put together, how to read the lists, and its caveats →

Missing data: a record is absent or incomplete. Text cleanup: stray characters or markup in a field. For review: a difference worth a look, not an error. Nothing found: the check found nothing in this release.

Missing and outdated records

Assessments and taxa that are absent, unreachable in the API, or without a current assessment.

ObservationTypeRowsOpen
Assessments whose geographic scope is blank, so any scope filter, including the usual "Global" filter, silently drops them.
Missing data 52
Historical assessment ids that appear in a taxon's API record but return HTTP 404 (not found) when requested directly.
Missing data 3
Assessed subspecies and varieties whose parent species has no assessment of its own, leaving them reachable only by their SIS id.
Missing data 358
Taxa whose assessments are all historical: none is flagged as current, usually because the taxon was removed, merged, or reclassified.
For review 4,218

Text cleanup

Stray whitespace, markup, and values that disagree with each other in name, synonym, and narrative fields.

ObservationTypeRowsOpen
Taxonomy field values with stray whitespace (leading, trailing, doubled, or non-breaking), each with a suggested cleaned-up value.
Text cleanup 1,099
Synonym names with stray whitespace (leading, trailing, doubled, or non-breaking), each with a whitespace-normalised suggestion.
Text cleanup 11,827
Synonym names containing HTML markup, stray HTML entities, or typographic quotes, each with a cleaned plain-text suggestion.
Text cleanup 2,802
Synonyms whose name field contains a bracketed nomenclatural note, such as [orth. error], alongside the name itself.
Text cleanup 2,309
English common names with a likely error or a formatting choice worth checking (species codes, all-capitals text, stray whitespace, backticks standing in for apostrophes), with a tidied suggestion where one is clear.
Text cleanup 615
Assessments whose narrative text differs between the HTML and plain-text CSV exports, often because heavy redundant markup left the plain-text version empty or truncated.
Text cleanup 523
Assessments whose recorded scientific name does not agree with the separate genus, species, and infrarank fields it should be built from.
Text cleanup 4
A field-by-field profile of text irregularities in the taxonomy data, showing which fields have the most stray whitespace or unusual characters.
For review 8

Catalogue of Life crosscheck

Differences found when checking every assessed name against the Catalogue of Life; each is on exactly one of these pages.

ObservationTypeRowsOpen
IUCN names that appear nowhere in the Catalogue of Life, with no close spelling match and no other name for the taxon there either.
For review 745
IUCN names that appear nowhere in the Catalogue of Life, each paired with the most similar CoL spelling and a note on how the two differ.
For review 799
The IUCN name is not in CoL, but one of the taxon's other IUCN-listed names is there as a synonym; a lead to check, not a confirmed match.
For review 134
Assessed IUCN taxa whose name the Catalogue of Life records as a synonym of a different accepted name.
For review 11,664
Genus, family, order, and class names used in the IUCN classification that the Catalogue of Life records only as synonyms.
For review 717
Names whose parent taxon is spelled slightly differently in IUCN and the Catalogue of Life, suggesting the same placement written two ways.
For review 94
Names that match the Catalogue of Life exactly but whose author attribution is spelled slightly differently in the two catalogues.
For review 9,343
The two catalogues accept different names for the same taxon; IUCN's synonym list already links the pair.
For review 2,742
Names the Catalogue of Life places under a genuinely different parent taxon (not just a different spelling of the same one).
For review 1,663