IUCN Red List data observations

An unofficial, independent review to support data improvement · IUCN Red List version 2026-1

Text hygiene by taxonomy field

Source: IUCN Red List 2026-1 (CSV export, taxonomy file) · 8 rows

The table below profiles the text of each taxonomy field, one row per field and characteristic: what share of the field's values have surrounding whitespace, repeated spaces, non-breaking or control characters, or non-NFC Unicode normalisation. Counts cover every value in the field.

Why it matters

This profile shows which fields have the most text irregularities, so cleanup effort can be aimed where it has the most effect.

Suggestion

Use the percentages to prioritise. Fields with a high share of surrounding whitespace, repeated spaces, or non-NFC values are the best candidates for a normalisation pass.

Preview

FieldCharacteristicRows affected% of valuesExampleSuggestedDetail
infraAuthorityall-null-column188,792100(empty)Every value in this column is null in this release. 188,792 of 188,792 values (100%).
taxonomicNotesnon-breaking-or-control-whitespace13,6977.255Fernando·de·Buén·describedHubbsina·turneri·after·specimens·he·collected·in·August·1940·in·the·Presa·Cointzio,·Río·Grande·de·Morelia·drainage.·In·1983,·Uyeno·et·al.·published·studies·on·the·Karyotypes·of·Goodeids·and·A.·Radda·attached·importance·to·these·results,·According·to·identical·Karyotypes,·he·transfered·1984·this·species·into·the·genus·Girardinichthys.·Though·phylogenetic·results·since·the·early·2000's·(Doadrio·and·Domínguez,·2004)·supported·the·individuality·of·the·genus·Hubbsina,·Radda·held·onto·his·system,·in·2004·raising·the·stock·from·the·Lago·Zacapú·to·species·rank·describing·it·as·Girardinichthys·ireneae.·This·stock·isnow·regarded·as·subpopulation·of·Hubbsina·turneri.·According·to·its·affiliation·to·three·drainages,·three·subpopulations·are·distinguished:·The·Río·Grande·de·Morelia·subpopulation·(type·subpopulation),·the·Laguna·Yuriría·subpopulation·and·the·Río·Angulo·subpopulation.·The·first·two·subpopulations·are·regarded·Extinct.·This·species·is·here·considered·valid·in·the·genus·Hubbsina·de·Buen,·1940·followingRamírez-Herrejónet·al.·(2010).·This·differs·from·Eschmeyer·et·al.·(2018)·which·consider·it·meanwhile·valid·in·the·genusGirardinichthys·Bleeker,·1860.Values contain non-breaking, zero-width, or control whitespace characters. 13,697 of 188,792 values (7.255%).
taxonomicNotesleading-or-trailing-whitespace1,5720.833Traditionally·placed·in·the·genus·Kachuga,·it·was·assigned·to·the·subgenus·Pangshura·by·Moll·(1987);·Pangshura·was·elevated·to·genus·level·by·Das·(2001).Traditionally placed in the genus Kachuga, it was assigned to the subgenus Pangshura by Moll (1987); Pangshura was elevated to genus level by Das (2001).Values have surrounding whitespace; the suggested value trims it. 1,572 of 188,792 values (0.833%).
authorityleading-or-trailing-whitespace9160.485(K.Schum.)·F.H.Brandt·(K.Schum.) F.H.BrandtValues have surrounding whitespace; the suggested value trims it. 916 of 188,792 values (0.485%).
authorityrepeated-spaces2070.11(empty)Values contain repeated spaces. 207 of 188,792 values (0.11%).
authoritynon-breaking-or-control-whitespace730.039(L.)H.HaraValues contain non-breaking, zero-width, or control whitespace characters. 73 of 188,792 values (0.039%).
taxonomicNotesnot-nfc-normalised380.02We·provisionally·treat·Pseudocerastes·fieldi·Schmidt,·1930·as·a·distinct·species·(Uetz·and·Hallermann·2010,·Uetz·et·al.·2018,·Šmíd·and·Tolley·2019),·although·in·some·accounts·it·is·treated·as·a·subspecies·of·P.·persicus·(Leviton·et·al.·1992).Pseudocerastes·bicornis·Wall,·1913,·described·from·a·single·locality·on·the·Pakistan-Afghanistan·border·at·the·eastern·range·limit·for·the·genus,·has·long·been·considered·a·junior·synonym·of·P.·persicus·(Sindaco·et·al.·2013),·and·this·scheme·is·followed·here,·but·is·listed·as·a·valid·species·without·comment·by·Khan·(2006).Recent·studies·have·confirmed·that·Pseudocerastes·persicus·from·Oman·and·the·United·Arab·Emirates·are·genetically·the·same·as·those·from·Iran·(de·Pous·et·al.·2016).We provisionally treat Pseudocerastes fieldi Schmidt, 1930 as a distinct species (Uetz and Hallermann 2010, Uetz et al. 2018, Šmíd and Tolley 2019), although in some accounts it is treated as a subspecies of P. persicus (Leviton et al. 1992).Pseudocerastes bicornis Wall, 1913, described from a single locality on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border at the eastern range limit for the genus, has long been considered a junior synonym of P. persicus (Sindaco et al. 2013), and this scheme is followed here, but is listed as a valid species without comment by Khan (2006).Recent studies have confirmed that Pseudocerastes persicus from Oman and the United Arab Emirates are genetically the same as those from Iran (de Pous et al. 2016).Some values are not in NFC normalisation form. 38 of 188,792 values (0.02%).
authoritynot-nfc-normalised50.003Arteaga,·Salazar-Valenzuela,·Mebert,·Peñafiel,·Aguiar,·Sánchez-Nivicela,·Pyron,·Colston,·Cisneros-Heredia,·Yánez-Muñoz,·Venegas,·Guayasamin·&·Torres-Carvajal,·2018Arteaga, Salazar-Valenzuela, Mebert, Peñafiel, Aguiar, Sánchez-Nivicela, Pyron, Colston, Cisneros-Heredia, Yánez-Muñoz, Venegas, Guayasamin & Torres-Carvajal, 2018Some values are not in NFC normalisation form. 5 of 188,792 values (0.003%).

View the full list →   Download CSV (8 rows)